First he defended Ken Conklin PhD and now he is legitimizing my research which proved that Ken Conklin PhD is incorrect:
This is what Ken Conklin wrote about the Hawaiian word "ohana." Note that he amended it but he does not reflect the fact that I, Lana, pointed it out to him that "Ohana" has been in Hawaiian language papers as early as 1834 which proves that "ohana" is NOT a modern invention as he inaccurately claims on his website here inaccurately asserting that the Hawaiian word "ohana" was created in about 1950 when it was not:
I pointed out that the Hawaiian word "ohana" is shown being used as early as in 1834 NOT in 1950 which Ken Conklin tries to deceptively lead people to believe:
I have repeatedly pointed out and will continue to point out that I am NOT the only Hawaiian nor the first Hawaiian who is aware of this... but my name is credited with this discovery.
This is Jere Krischel commending me on showing evidence which implies that I defrocked Ken Conklin PhDs pseudo-intellectualism as it relates to the Hawaiian culture, language, and people. In other words... Jere contradicts himself once again here:
"Well Paul, you keep shoving stuff, but it sure isn't evidence, or reason.
In fact, the only person who has bothered to show any real evidence is our dear friend Lana, who actually found references to "ohana" in 1800's newspapers. You, on the other hand, are clearly in the realm of opinon unfettered by fact, be it stretched interpretations of Springer, constantly shifting definitions of "indigenous", to name a few.
I grant you, the reason is not the same thing as evidence - but reasons have to be based on some sort of foundation, and if someone expresses a reason based on a faulty foundation, it can clearly understood and challenged. It is my contention that if kalani tried to express his reasons for disagreeing with Ken's analysis of Sai's fraud at the Hague, you would find that there was either no foundation at all for his reasoning, or a faulty one.
Jere Krischel | Homepage | 04.05.06 - 6:33 am | #"
That is why he like his puppet master, Ken Conklin PhD, LOSE against people like us. It's because their racism against Hawaiians shines right through and I know people in the states. They do not and will not tolerate that despite what they say about Americans and about Hawaiians. Most people believe in doing what is right instead of doing what is wrong then along comes Ken Conkln PhD and Jere Krischel. Two white men who are evil.
This is how Ken Conklin PhD who is from Boston, Massachusetts now living in Kaneohe, Oahu looks:
From the Honolulu Advertiser
He looks EVIL with an evil smirk on his face. One of my life goals is to stomp out racism against Hawaiians since I am Hawaiian. I cannot help but think if people like Ken Conklin PhD and Jere Krischel are racist against Hawaiians then they are also racist against Hawaiian children which affects me because I care about children including but not limited to Hawaiian children.
Anyway I have contained their evilness called "Conklin-itis." One symptom of this disease is racism against Hawaiians. I know that others are innoculating others from this disease too and so far we have been successful.